- FHLs – Abolition of Tax Breaks
- Autumn Statement 2023 - Property Tax Update
- Elective surgery
- Building a new world
- Budget 2023 - Initial Reaction
- Register of Overseas Entities - Anti-Money Laundering Update
- Autumn Statement – Tax Bonfire! Real Estate & Construction Update
- Is anybody listening?
- Infrastructure Levy (IL)
- Land of confusion? Making sense of the Community Infrastructure Levy
- Who will guard the guards themselves
- LRTR Boost your Tax Savings & Unlocking Toxic Land
- Comedy of errors goes to High Court
- Budget 2021 - Property & Construction Initial Reaction
- Ignorance is No Defence!
- Steadfast Manufacturing & Storage Limited v HMRC – Case Law Update
- "Cash is King" ... Boost Post Coronavirus Cash Flows by Revisiting Historic Property Expenditure
- Jumping the Gun - E³ Consulting comment on Oval Estates Decision [2020] EWHC 457 (Admin)
- When the Levy Breaks… Coronavirus impact on CIL
- 100% ECAs Withdrawn, but Tax Savings Still Available
- Budget 2020 - Reaction
- Postponement of the UK VAT domestic reverse charge
- Edge of Tomorrow - Land remediation tax relief: ten years on
- Mayoral CIL2 Confirmed by Public Examiner
- Sudden Impact!
- Budget 2018 - Reaction
- Tax breaks lessen MEES impact on commercial property landlords
- Budget 2017 key points
- #AS2016 – Real Estate & Construction Update
- An Inspector Calls - Planning Appeal decision
- First Tier Tribunal decision in Susanna Posnett v HMRC
- A Sledge Hammer Approach
- Dodging a Bullet
- Purpose Built Student Accommodation (PBSA)
- Budget 2016 - Reaction
- Reaction to Spending Review & Autumn Statement 2015
- Fistful of Dollars
- Caring for Your Cash Flow – Property Tax
- Reaction to Budget 2015 – Real Estate Tax Update
- Shut the Barn Door
- Pub Conversion Projects – Should I Be Paying Value Added Tax (VAT)?
- The Long & Winding Road: Tax Landscape Evolving
- The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
- Budget 2014 - Reaction
- Adapting to Change - Capital Allowances April 2014
- Autumn Statement 2013
- Are you squeezing all the available tax relief out of your property?
- Investment Property Forum Focus: Spotlight on Tax Planning
- Mist Clears - Autumn Statement
- Fool's Gold
- Real Estate Tax Update
- J D Wetherspoon's Expected Outcome - 'Just & Reasonable'
- Capital Allowances Tax Relief on Restaurants, Bars & Hotels
- E3 Consulting Advises Rose Bowl on Cricket Stadium Development
- Energy Efficiency and Property Tax Savings
Comedy of errors goes to High Court
E³ Consulting comment on
Trent v Hertsmere Borough Council Decision
[2021] EWHC 907 (Admin)
Summary
A dispute over property ‘tax’ which led to a landmark ruling at the High Court has been branded ‘a warning shot’ over the bows of local planning authorities.
Mrs Justice Lang decided in favour of a planning applicant over her local council at the hearing into a £16,389 Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) demand and surcharges of £2,550.
The case of Trent v Hertsmere Borough Council (HBC) revealed errors on both sides but delays and mistakes on the part of the local planning authority were the deciding factors.
Property tax specialist E3 Consulting said the ruling is a clear warning to ensure paperwork and procedures are correct – especially for councils.
Alun Oliver FRICS, who is managing director of E3 Consulting, said: “As is so often the case in such cases, when things go wrong the facts are messy and rather complicated.
“This decision provides a timely reminder to all Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) to follow, precisely, the correct procedures in any CIL matter – not least the requirement to act promptly – otherwise they could forfeit the levy payments otherwise due.”
The dispute arose following the issue of CIL demand notices by HBC on the construction of a new home by Alison Trent in Radlett following a planning permission granted in February 2017.
The case revolved Ms Trent’s submission of CIL forms – including a Form 7 (Part 1) self-build exemption claim – and the council’s belated response.
Ms Trent began work without following up on the self-build application and didn’t submit the necessary Notice of Intended Commencement. The issue only came to light after the development was finished in 2019.
HBC then issued their CIL Liability & Demand Notices but these were quashed by a planning inspector. A second CIL demand notice from the council in 2020 was successfully challenged again by Ms Trent by way of a judicial review at the High Court.
Alun added: “Unlike this landmark case, the vast majority of CIL appeals tend to find in favour of the local planning authorities.
“In this case there was quite a catalogue of errors on both sides but particularly from HBC in failing to respond and demonstrate that the relevant CIL processes had been correctly followed.
“Early advice is key to avoiding costly errors. Once work has started in the vast majority of cases it is usually too late and rarely results in a favourable outcome for the developer or homeowner.”
Full Article
For full analysis of the case, please see the download link to the right side of the page with our full article available.
Share this page
Document downloads
-
- A Comedy of Errors
- CIL Update: Trent v Hertsmere BC 04-2021
- pdf (222.79kb)
Related Pages
RSS
- This page can be found in the following news feeds:
- E3 Consulting News